INTERNAL CASE STUDY
Our own site: aligning explanations with actual behaviour
A record of changes to the review wording, note tools and language links on EntityClinic’s own website.
Document updated: 2026.09.07
Scope and purpose
In September 2026, we revised our own website to distinguish a self-check from an actual site review and make related reading easier to find. This is not a client results case study.
What changed
- We removed unsupported scoring and claims of official requirements, and described the 36 items as practical review criteria.
- We completed the unfinished flow with eight self-assessment questions, suggested checks, editable notes, copying and downloading. We did not present it as automated analysis or enquiry submission.
- We linked corresponding Korean, English and Simplified Chinese pages and organised their canonical URLs, site search listings and source links.
How we checked
On 7 September 2026, we reran automated tests and confirmed that checks for internal links, page metadata, language links, unanswered responses and note generation passed. Earlier interaction checks also covered search, combined filters, copying, saving and resetting. Visual checks in a real browser at different screen sizes were not part of the verification recorded here.
Verified results and remaining work
The verified result is that we revised and tested the document structure and functions. We have not measured effects on indexing, rankings, AI citations or enquiry growth. Passing functional tests is not a measure of search performance.