SCOPE & LIMITS

What a review can tell you,
and what it cannot.

Technical readiness, actual AI answers, visits, and inquiries are separate stages.

What a page review can establish

We check consistency of official information, text and document structure, links and metadata, public access settings, and basic mobile usability. We record the pages reviewed and when they were checked.

What needs separate measurement

Indexing, search-result visibility, practice mentions and URL citations in AI answers, site visits, calls, and bookings each need their own data. We do not infer them from a page review alone.

What we do not determine automatically

Page wording alone does not establish clinical appropriateness, specialist credentials, equipment effectiveness, the reasonableness of fees, or whether medical advertising review is required. These require evidence and a responsible person to verify the facts.

This site's self-check

We organize review items from your answers to eight questions. We do not visit the URL you enter, send questions to AI services, or calculate a score. Unanswered items remain marked as unanswered.

When criteria change, comparisons need another look

We log changes to review items and explanations. To interpret before-and-after results accurately, changes to actual pages must be distinguished from changes to assessment criteria.

Outcomes we cannot guarantee

We do not guarantee search rankings, AI recommendations, patient numbers, or revenue. Readable pages and accurate information are foundations for operation, not a way to control search or recommendation systems.

Back to all criteria

What are you looking for?